I toyed with writing an extension method, also with inheriting from IList and implementing my own Sort() method as well bey casting to a List but none of these seemed overly elegant.
1 @supercat: What could ISortableList offer that's derece already in IList? Or, asked differently, why couldn't an IList be sorted in-place without re-adding the items by your imagined static method?
Also, it casts IList to IList which katışıksız the potential to be dangerous. In most cases that I have seen, List which implements IList is used behind the scenes to implement IList, but this is hamiş guaranteed and yaşama lead to brittle code.
Why does the Clausius inequality involve a single term/integral if we consider a body interacting with multiple heat sources/sinks?
Ilgilı listeler, hareketli veri örgülarıdır. Bu sayede araya eleman ekleme, silme kadar nöbetlemler daha emeksiz bir şekilde yapılabilir. Bu makalemızda bandajlı listelerin detaylarından bahsedeceğiz.
List is a specific implementation of IList, which is a container that dirilik be addressed the same way birli a linear array T[] using an integer index. When you specify IList birli the type of the method's argument, you only specify that you need certain capabilities of the container. For example, the interface specification does derece enforce a specific data structure to be used.
Most app-level code (i.e. the everyday code that ou write for your application) should probably focus on the generic versions; however there is also a lot of infrastructure code around that must use reflection.
If you specify your methods to return an interface that means you are free to C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız change the exact implementation later on without the consuming method ever knowing.
And, if you don't even need everything in IList you dirilik always use IEnumerable too. With çağcıl compilers and processors, I don't think there is really any speed difference, so this is more just a matter of style.
List implements those büyük anne methods (hamiş including extension methods), on ferde of that it has about 41 public C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız methods, which weighs in your consideration of which one to use in your application.
If you're working within a single method (or even in a single class or assembly in some cases) and no one outside is going to C# IList Kullanımı see what you're doing, use the fullness of a List. But if you're interacting with outside code, like when you're returning a list from a method, then you only C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız want to declare the interface without necessarily tying yourself to a specific implementation, especially if you have no control over who compiles against your code afterward.
Collaborate with us on GitHub The source for this content gönül be found on GitHub, where you gönül also create and review issues and pull requests. For more information, see our contributor guide.
Unless you have a very compelling reason to do so, your best bet will be to inherit from System.Collections.ObjectModel.Collection since it has everything you need.
ahead of time. Data-binding is a classic example here; a DataSource property usually checks for IList (and IListSource, typically) and then looks at C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız the objects to see what properties are available. It dirilik't use generics in this case.